Powell v. Walmart, Inc.
| Phoebe J. Powell |
| Walmart, Inc. doing business as Walmart Supercenter #7290 |
| 3:2023cv00137 |
| March 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| David J Hale |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Walmart, Inc. (Quesenberry, Kathryn) |
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 4/20/2023: Defendant Walmart Inc. shall have an additional 21 days, up to and including 5/9/2023, in which to move, answer, or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint. cc: Counsel (DLW)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of extension of time to answer by Walmart, Inc. (Quesenberry, Kathryn) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 4/12/2023 granting #7 Motion for Hayley G. Clancy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc: Counsel(NWT)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) by Walmart, Inc. (Quesenberry, Kathryn) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Hayley G. Clancy to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $125, receipt number AKYWDC-3784351) by Defendant Walmart, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Quesenberry, Kathryn) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Phoebe J. Powell. Walmart, Inc. served on 3/29/2023, answer due 4/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Summons Return of Service on Defendant) (Hachten, Benjamin) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Phoebe J. Powell (Attachments: #1 Summons Return of Service on Defendant) (Hachten, Benjamin) |
| NOTICE of email comfirmation as to Benjamin F. Hachten re #4 Request for Fee Refund. (MLG) |
| Filing 4 Request for Fee Refund by Phoebe J. Powell. (Hachten, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Walmart, Inc. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (CDL) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (CDL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Walmart, Inc., (Filing fee $402, receipt number AKYWDC-3775127), filed by Phoebe J. Powell. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered) (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Powell v. Walmart, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Phoebe J. Powell | |
| Represented By: | Ann B. Oldfather |
| Represented By: | Benjamin F. Hachten |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart, Inc. doing business as Walmart Supercenter #7290 | |
| Represented By: | Hayley Geiler Clancy |
| Represented By: | Kathryn A. Quesenberry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
