Brantley v. United States Government, et al
Plaintiff: David Thomas Harris Brantley
Defendant: United States Government and Canadian Government
Case Number: 3:2023cv00278
Filed: May 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Rebecca Grady Jennings
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTICE of Filing by David Thomas Harris Brantley. (SMJ)
June 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER (EBOC) by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 6/12/2023 granting #10 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. cc: Petitioner-pro se (SMJ)
June 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (KJA)
June 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Southern; Case Number 4:23-cv-00055. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (KJA)
May 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Western District of Kentucky. Case transferred electronically to Western District of Kentucky, on May 30, 2023. (KAA) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.]
May 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CLOSED TRANSFER to Western District of Kentucky. ORDER ON MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE - granting #8 Motion to Change Venue. This case shall be transferred to the Western District of Kentucky. The Clerk is DIRECTED TO TRANSFER this matter to the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Louisville Division, and CLOSE the matter on this Court's docket. All other pending motions will remain pending to be resolved by the receiving court. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/30/2023.(KAA) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.]
April 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DAVID THOMAS HARRIS BRANTLEY. (LF) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.] Modified on 6/1/2023 (ARM).- Reinstated as pending motion.
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Defendant Change, filed by Plaintiff DAVID THOMAS HARRIS BRANTLEY. (LBT) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.] Modified on 6/1/2023 (ARM).- Reinstated as pending.
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Change Venue, filed by Plaintiff DAVID THOMAS HARRIS BRANTLEY. (LBT) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.]
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Change of Living Arrangements, filed by Plaintiff DAVID THOMAS HARRIS BRANTLEY. (LBT) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.]
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION Cease and Desist, filed by Plaintiff DAVID THOMAS HARRIS BRANTLEY. (LBT) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.]
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through May 4, 2023 in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (TRG) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.]
April 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (LF) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.]
April 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.]
April 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LF) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.]
April 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CANADIAN GOVERNMENT, UNTITED STATES GOVERNMENT, filed by DAVID THOMAS HARRIS BRANTLEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (LF) [Transferred from insd on 6/1/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brantley v. United States Government, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Thomas Harris Brantley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Canadian Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?