Caffee v. Commissioner of Social Security
Stephen Caffee |
Commissioner of Social Security |
3:2023cv00279 |
June 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Regina S Edwards |
Charles R Simpson |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SOCIAL SECURITY ORDER (EBOC) by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 7/28/2023. The case is referred to Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards for consideration and the preparation of a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B). cc: counsel (SRH) |
Filing 9 ERROR: DOCKETED IN WRONG CASE. (SRH) |
Filing 8 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD received from Social Security. Social Security Submission due by 10/10/2023. by Commissioner of Social Security. (Muir, Chad) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION Re DN 9 SSA Administrative Record; Error: Filed in Wrong Case; Correction: filed by counsel in the correct case also (5:23-cv-80). (SRH) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad Muir on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Muir, Chad) |
Filing 6 Case reassigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III pursuant to General Order 2023-02.cc: Counsel, CM-CRS (AEH) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of filing of civil cover sheet by Stephen Caffee re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet civil cover sheet) (Lani, Alan) |
Filing 4 Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 6/23/2023. (CDL) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF SERVICE: Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and #General Order 2023-2:, the Court hereby notifies the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the United States Attorney's Office for the Western District of Kentucky that a Complaint seeking judicial review has been filed. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the official notification referenced in Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions. The plaintiff does not need to serve separately a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No Document is attached. (CDL) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards. (CDL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, (Filing fee $402, receipt number AKYWDC-3819360), filed by Stephen Caffee. (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Caffee v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Stephen Caffee | |
Represented By: | Alan L. Lani |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Seth Schecter |
Represented By: | Timothy D. Thompson |
Represented By: | Chad Muir |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.