Caffee v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Stephen Caffee
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2023cv00279
Filed: June 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Regina S Edwards
Referring Judge: Charles R Simpson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SOCIAL SECURITY ORDER (EBOC) by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 7/28/2023. The case is referred to Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards for consideration and the preparation of a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B). cc: counsel (SRH)
July 27, 2023 Filing 9 ERROR: DOCKETED IN WRONG CASE. (SRH)
July 27, 2023 Filing 8 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD received from Social Security. Social Security Submission due by 10/10/2023. by Commissioner of Social Security. (Muir, Chad)
July 27, 2023 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION Re DN 9 SSA Administrative Record; Error: Filed in Wrong Case; Correction: filed by counsel in the correct case also (5:23-cv-80). (SRH)
July 26, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad Muir on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Muir, Chad)
June 7, 2023 Filing 6 Case reassigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III pursuant to General Order 2023-02.cc: Counsel, CM-CRS (AEH)
June 2, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of filing of civil cover sheet by Stephen Caffee re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet civil cover sheet) (Lani, Alan)
June 2, 2023 Filing 4 Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 6/23/2023. (CDL)
June 2, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF SERVICE: Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and #General Order 2023-2:, the Court hereby notifies the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the United States Attorney's Office for the Western District of Kentucky that a Complaint seeking judicial review has been filed. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the official notification referenced in Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions. The plaintiff does not need to serve separately a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No Document is attached. (CDL)
June 1, 2023 Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards. (CDL)
June 1, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, (Filing fee $402, receipt number AKYWDC-3819360), filed by Stephen Caffee. (CDL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caffee v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Caffee
Represented By: Alan L. Lani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Benjamin Seth Schecter
Represented By: Timothy D. Thompson
Represented By: Chad Muir
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?