Vittitow v. Raytheon Company
| Kevin Vittitow |
| Raytheon Company |
| 3:2023cv00291 |
| June 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Rebecca Grady Jennings |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Raytheon Company. (Brady, Kevin) |
Filing 12
ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 7/21/2023 granting #10 Motion for Kevin R. Brady to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 7/21/2023 granting #9 Motion for Kyle A. Petersen to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Kevin R. Brady to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3848283. by Defendant Raytheon Company (Swartz, James) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Kyle Petersen to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3848234. by Defendant Raytheon Company (Swartz, James) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 7/6/2023 granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Raytheon's deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended through and including 7/31/2023. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 7 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendant Raytheon Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Swartz, James) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) identifying Corporate Parent Raytheon Technologies Corporation for Raytheon Company. by Raytheon Company. (Swartz, James) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kevin Vittitow. Raytheon Company served on 6/12/2023, answer due 7/3/2023. (Ferguson, Taylor) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Raytheon Company. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (CDL) |
| Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (CDL) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Taylor J. Ferguson on behalf of Kevin Vittitow. (CDL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Raytheon Company, (Filing fee $402, receipt number AKYWDC-3822270), filed by Kevin Vittitow. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered) (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vittitow v. Raytheon Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Vittitow | |
| Represented By: | Taylor J. Ferguson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Raytheon Company | |
| Represented By: | James J. Swartz, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Kevin R. Brady |
| Represented By: | Kyle Anne Petersen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
