Hineson v. Wade et al
Wendy Hineson |
Nathan Wade, Kelsie Torres and Amanda Durham |
3:2023cv00316 |
June 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Joseph H McKinley |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Remark: Case transferred from Kentucky Western has been opened in Eastern District of Kentucky as case 3:23-cv-00043, filed 06/27/2023. (KJA) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 6/26/23: IT IS ORDERED that the instant action shall be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Central Division at Frankfort, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) for all further proceedings. All further filings shall be filed with that court. Should any filings in this action be filed in this Court in the future, the Clerk of Court shall transfer the filings to the Eastern District of Kentucky. cc: Plaintiff(pro se), ED/KY (DJT) |
Filing 4 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley Jr. (CDL) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Wendy Hineson. (CDL) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Wendy Hineson. (CDL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amanda Durham, Kelsie Torres, Nathan Wade, (No filing fee paid), filed by Wendy Hineson. (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.