Williamson v. Wakefield et al
| Antonio-Dionte Williamson |
| Tim Wakefield, Jeff Tindall, Craig Smith, Michael Bennett and Joshua D. Judd |
| 3:2023cv00339 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF OBJECTION TO COURT'S ORDER ON GROUNDS OF EQUITY re #3 Order, filed by Antonio-Dionte Williamson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (DJT)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.on 7/31/2023: IT IS ORDERED that within 30 days from the entry date of this Order, Petitioner must file his petition on a Court-supplied 2254 form. Petitioner is FURTHER ORDERED to name as the Respondent in his petition only Jeff Tindall, the Jailer of the Oldham County Detention Center, where Petitioner is incarcerated. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a 28 U.S.C. 2254 form with this case number written in the caption.cc: Petitioner, pro se, w/ 2254 form (EAS)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Antonio-Dionte Williamson. (DJT)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 300004116 by Antonio-Dionte Williamson. (DJT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
