Embry-Littleton v. Amazon SDF8 et al
| Lisa H. Embry-Littleton |
| Amazon SDF8 and Claybrooke Springer |
| 3:2023cv00362 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| David J Hale |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remark: Case transferred from Kentucky Western has been opened in Southern District of Indiana as case 4:23-cv-00134, filed 08/14/2023. (KJA) |
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 8/9/2023: The instant action shall be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) for all further proceedings. All further filings shall be filed with that court. Should any filings in this action be filed in this Court in the future, the Clerk of Court shall transfer the filings to the Southern District of Indiana. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) (DLW)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Lisa H. Embry-Littleton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amazon SDF8 and Claybrooke Springer, filed by Lisa H. Embry-Littleton. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
