Damrell v. Madison County Detention Center et al
| Derick Damrell |
| Madison County Detention Center, Richmond Police Department and Facility & Medical Staff |
| 3:2023cv00382 |
| July 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable #4 sent to Derick Damrell (EAS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint,.Reason for Deficiency: No Prisoner Trust Statement filed with Motion. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 8/30/2023. (DJT) |
| Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Derick Damrell (DJT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Facility & Medical Staff, Madison County Detention Center, Richmond Police Department, filed by Derick Damrell. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2) (DJT) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/31/2023: #5 Exhibit State Court - Motion for Due Process of Law, #6 Exhibit State Court Motion for Due Process, #7 Exhibit Motion for Fast and Speedy Trial, #8 Exhibit Motion for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel) (DJT). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
