Soho Logistic, Inc. v. Inxeption Corporation
| Soho Logistic, Inc. |
| Inxeption Corporation |
| 3:2024cv00006 |
| January 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Rebecca Grady Jennings |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
AGREED ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 2/22/2024 granting #11 Proposed Agreed Order. The Defendant, Inxeption Corporation, shall have up to and including 3/5/2024, to file an Answer or responsive pleading to the claims asserted by Plaintiff, Soho Logistic Inc. in this matter. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 11 Proposed Agreed Order by Inxeption Corporation. (Theuerkauf, Robert) |
|
Filing 10
AGREED ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 2/6/2024 granting #9 Proposed Agreed Order. The Defendant, Inxeption Corporation, shall have up to and including 2/20/2024, to file an Answer or responsive pleading to the claims asserted by Plaintiff Soho Logistic Inc. in this matter. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 9 Proposed Agreed Order EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD by Inxeption Corporation. (Theuerkauf, Robert) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert J. Theuerkauf on behalf of Inxeption Corporation (Theuerkauf, Robert) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Soho Logistic, Inc.. Inxeption Corporation served on 1/16/2024, answer due 2/6/2024. (Creal, Courtney) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Soho Logistic, Inc.. Inxeption Corporation served on 1/9/2024, answer due 1/30/2024. (Creal, Courtney) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued as to Inxeption Corporation. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summonses. (DeW) |
| Filing 4 Diversity Case Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(2)) by Soho Logistic, Inc. (DeW) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) by Soho Logistic, Inc. (DeW) (Main Document 3 replaced on 1/3/2024) (DeW). |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (DeW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Soho Logistic, Inc. against Inxeption Corporation. (Filing fee $405, receipt number BKYWDC-3949318.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Invoices, #3 Exhibit C - Open Balance Report, #4 Summons TENDERED to Def, #5 Summons TENDERED to Registered Agent, #6 Cover Sheet) (DeW) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/3/2024) (DeW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Soho Logistic, Inc. v. Inxeption Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Soho Logistic, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Courtney L. Creal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Inxeption Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Robert J. Theuerkauf |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
