Williams v. Moore et al
Linda C. Williams |
Darnell T. Moore and United States Postal Service |
3:2024cv00031 |
January 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Benjamin Beaton |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice of Filing re #4 Notice of Deficiency filed by Linda C. Williams. (HMC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Cover Sheet. Reason for Deficiency: Filing not signed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 1/24/2024. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (HMC) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Darnell T. Moore, United States Postal Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summonses. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (HMC) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (HMC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Linda C. Williams against Darnell T. Moore and United States Postal Service. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AKYWDC-3958019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Case Cover Sheet, #5 Summons for Moore, #6 Summons for USPS) (HMC) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/17/2024: #7 Signed Civil Cover Sheet) (HMC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.