Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security
Kevin Lee Wright |
Commissioner of Social Security |
3:2024cv00037 |
January 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Colin H Lindsay |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SOCIAL SECURITY ORDER (EBOC) by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 03/14/2024. Within thirty (30) days after the filing of the answer or the administrative record, the plaintiff must set forth his/her position by an appropriate brief specifying, inter alia, the numbered findings of the final decision with which exception is taken and the specific errors alleged. Any such brief shall be accompanied by a Fact and Law Summary on a form supplied by the Court. Failure of the plaintiff to comply with this provision may constitute grounds for dismissing the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Fact and Law Summary) cc: Counsel (HMC) |
Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Kevin Lee Wright. (HMC) |
Filing 6 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD received from Social Security. Social Security Submission due by 5/24/2024. by Commissioner of Social Security. (Muir, Chad) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad Muir on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Muir, Chad) |
Filing 4 Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 2/9/2024. (HMC) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF SERVICE: Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and #General Order 2023-2:, the Court hereby notifies the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the United States Attorney's Office for the Western District of Kentucky that a Complaint seeking judicial review has been filed. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the official notification referenced in Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions. The plaintiff does not need to serve separately a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No Document is attached. (HMC) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. (HMC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kevin Lee Wright against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AKYWDC-3959747. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (HMC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kevin Lee Wright | |
Represented By: | Julie Atkins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Seth Schecter |
Represented By: | Timothy D. Thompson |
Represented By: | Chad Muir |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.