Whitaker v. Rae et al
Brandon Whitaker |
Mark Rae and Russell Hanson |
3:2024cv00068 |
February 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Russell Hanson, Mark Rae. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order of Dismissal) (Carroll, John) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Brandon Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit kellar v. mh equip, #2 Exhibit clutter v. meko) (Astorino, Robert) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants Russell Hanson, Mark Rae (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit #1 - Complaint, #3 Exhibit #2 - State Coirt File, #4 Exhibit #3 - Cissell v. KFC, #5 Exhibit #4 - Smith v. Beshear, #6 Exhibit #5 - Runyon v. Bell, #7 Proposed Order) (Carroll, John) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record, Jefferson Circuit Court (MNM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (MNM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mark Rae and Russell Hanson from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 24-CI-000524 (filing fee $405, receipt number AKYWDC-3968170). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Removal, #3 Cover Sheet) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.