7D Holdings, LLC v. Jawk Holdings LLC et al
| 7D Holdings, LLC |
| Jawk Holdings LLC and GenRev Labs LLC |
| 3:2024cv00093 |
| February 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| David J Hale |
| Rebecca Grady Jennings |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re #1 Complaint. (MNM) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing or Determination re: Patent or Trademark re #1 Complaint. (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GenRev Labs LLC and Jawk Holdings LLC, filing fee $405, receipt number AKYWDC-3976797, filed by 7D Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Reg. No. 5,424,919, #2 Exhibit B - Reg. No. 5,683,543, #3 Exhibit C - Reg. No. 5,683,544, #4 Exhibit D - Ser. No. 90/756,988, #5 Exhibit E - Disposable Vapes, #6 Exhibit F - Dazed8 Website, #7 Exhibit G - WHOIS Database Registration Record - dazed8.com, #8 Exhibit H - Collective Websites, #9 Exhibit I - Cease and Desist Ltr to DazeD8, #10 Exhibit J - Follow-up Letter to JAWK Holdings LLC, #11 Exhibit K - Trademark Application - DAZED BAR - Ser. No. 98164154, #12 Exhibit L - Examples of Confusion, #13 Cover Sheet) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
