Gibbes v. Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company et al
Justin Gibbes |
Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company, Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
3:2024cv00099 |
February 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
David J Hale |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss filed by Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company. (Fenton, Thomas) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Justin Gibbes (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hemminger, David) |
Filing 13 AGREED ORDER OF SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 3/26/2024 granting #12 Proposed Agreed Order. Equifax's time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action be extended through and including 4/26/2024, and that any such responsive pleading by that date shall be deemed timely filed. cc: Counsel (KDY) |
Filing 12 Proposed Agreed Order of Extension of Time by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Williams, John) |
Filing 11 AGREED ORDER OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 2/27/2024 granting #9 Proposed Agreed Order. Equifax's time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action be extended through and including 3/27/2024, and that any such responsive pleading by that date shall be deemed timely filed. cc: Counsel (KDY) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) identifying Corporate Parent Equifax, Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC. by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Williams, John) |
Filing 9 Proposed Agreed Order of Extension of Time by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Williams, John) |
Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Fenton, Thomas) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas C. Fenton on behalf of Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company (Fenton, Thomas) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) identifying Corporate Parent Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. for Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company. by Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company. (Fenton, Thomas) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Civil Cover Sheet by Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company re #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Fenton, Thomas) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal. Reason for Deficiency: Missing Rule 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 2/27/2024. (KDY) |
Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (KDY) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE to Hardin Circuit Court and counsel/parties re #1 Notice of Removal. (KDY) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company from Hardin Circuit Court, case number 24-CI-00234. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AKYWDC-3979358) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Filings) (KDY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.