5419 New Cut Road, LLC v. Shelter General Insurance Company et al
5419 New Cut Road, LLC |
Shelter General Insurance Company, Nate Seely, Barry McAfee and Barry McAfee Agency, Inc. |
3:2024cv00184 |
March 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand filed in Jefferson Circuit Court (See DN #1 -5 for full viewing) by Nate Seely, Shelter General Insurance Company. (DJT) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL LETTER sent to Jefferson Circuit Court re #1 Notice of Removal. (DJT) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) by Shelter General Insurance Company. (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (DJT) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL [ANSWER FILED] by Shelter General Insurance Company, Nate Seely from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 24-CI-001172. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AKYWDC-3997899, filed by Shelter General Insurance Company, Nate Seely. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Addendum, #3 Exhibit Complaint, #4 Affidavit, #5 Exhibit State Court File, #6 Exhibit Notice of Removal- state, #7 Certificate of Filing) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.