Bratcher v. Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Michael Bratcher
Defendant: Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2024cv00436
Filed: July 30, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Rebecca Grady Jennings
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2024 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint Amended [DN 9] by Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company. (Hall, Sarah)
September 9, 2024 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company by Michael Bratcher re #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit policy) (Denham, James) Modified on 9/11/2024 - text corrected (SMJ).
August 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 08/15/2024 granting #7 Proposed Agreed Order. Plaintiff shall have until September 10, 2024 to respond to Peerless's Motion or otherwise amend his Complaint as of right. cc: Counsel (HMC)
August 14, 2024 Filing 7 Proposed Agreed Order of Extension of Time by Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company. (Wardle, Samuel)
August 6, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hall, Sarah)
July 31, 2024 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE to Hardin Circuit Court and Counsel of Record/parties re #1 Notice of Removal. (DeW)
July 31, 2024 Filing 4 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (DeW)
July 30, 2024 Filing 3 Diversity Case Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(2)) by Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company. (DeW)
July 30, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) by Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Corporate Parent Peerless Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Liberty Insurance Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty-USA Corporation, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Agency Corporation, Corporate Parent LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Group Inc. for Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company. (DeW)
July 30, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hardin Circuit Court, case number 24-CI-01056, filed by Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AKYWDC-4077401.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Policy, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing, #4 Cover Sheet) (DeW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bratcher v. Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company
Represented By: Sarah Nicole Hall
Represented By: Samuel W. Wardle
Represented By: Douglas W. Langdon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Bratcher
Represented By: James Barton Denham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?