Bratcher v. Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company
Michael Bratcher |
Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company |
3:2024cv00436 |
July 30, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint Amended [DN 9] by Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company. (Hall, Sarah) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company by Michael Bratcher re #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit policy) (Denham, James) Modified on 9/11/2024 - text corrected (SMJ). |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 08/15/2024 granting #7 Proposed Agreed Order. Plaintiff shall have until September 10, 2024 to respond to Peerless's Motion or otherwise amend his Complaint as of right. cc: Counsel (HMC) |
Filing 7 Proposed Agreed Order of Extension of Time by Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company. (Wardle, Samuel) |
Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hall, Sarah) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE to Hardin Circuit Court and Counsel of Record/parties re #1 Notice of Removal. (DeW) |
Filing 4 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (DeW) |
Filing 3 Diversity Case Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(2)) by Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company. (DeW) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) by Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Corporate Parent Peerless Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Liberty Insurance Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty-USA Corporation, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Agency Corporation, Corporate Parent LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Group Inc. for Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company. (DeW) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hardin Circuit Court, case number 24-CI-01056, filed by Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AKYWDC-4077401.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Policy, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing, #4 Cover Sheet) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bratcher v. Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Sarah Nicole Hall |
Represented By: | Samuel W. Wardle |
Represented By: | Douglas W. Langdon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Bratcher | |
Represented By: | James Barton Denham |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.