Sutton, et al v. KY Hopkins County, et al
| Edward Lee Sutton, Lester H. Turner, Linda Joyce Ford, Timothy D. May, Robin Littlepage, Tabitha Nance, Ladonia W. Nelson, Robert R. Teague, Daniel Todd and Tony Ward |
| Hopkins County, Kentucky and Jim Lantrip |
| Kentucky Association of Counties and Bobby A. Eversole |
| Jhonni Upton and Misti Titus |
| Chyrle Ava Taylor |
| 4:2003cv00003 |
| October 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| E. Robert Goebel |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
516
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 11/13/2009 denying request to file late claim 515 . cc:counse, Robert James (CSD)
|
|
Filing
511
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 10/8/09; No later than 10/23/09, class counsel shall provide the Claims Administrator the claim form attached to Pam Williams' letter.cc:counsel, Pam Williams (JBM)
|
|
Filing
477
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 8/19/09; the Appeal of Tammy (Benton) Duncan 448 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Claims Administrator is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED to the Claims Administrator for further consideration.cc:counsel, Tammy Duncan (JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
