Houchin et al v. Allstate Indemnity Insurance Company
| David Houchin and Angela Houchin |
| Allstate Indemnity Insurance Company |
| 4:2007cv00071 |
| May 24, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| Grayson |
| E. Robert Goebel |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion by Defendant, Allstate Indemnity Insurance Company, for summary judgment 65 is GRANTED IN PART. Defendants counterclaim for reverse bad faith is dismissed. The Court finds in favor of Defendant on all remaining claims and counterclaims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file within 30 days from the date ofentry of this Order documentation in support of its claim for investigation and litigation expenses, costs, and at torneys fees along with a proposed final judgment incorporating said amounts. Response and reply times shall be governed by local rule. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 6/25/12. cc:counsel, david Houchin (pro se), Angela Houchin (pro se) (JBM)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 29 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on claims of bad faith signed by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 9/22/2008. cc: Counsel (LMW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
