Grace v. Armstrong Coal Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dana K. Grace
Defendant: Armstrong Coal Company, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2008cv00109
Filed: August 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Hopkins
Presiding Judge: E. Robert Goebel
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. McKinley
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss counts IV, V, VI and VII of the amended complaint. Signed by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 2/12/09. cc:counsel (JBM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grace v. Armstrong Coal Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dana K. Grace
Represented By: Evan Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Armstrong Coal Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?