Young v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
Harry T. Young |
United States Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, Joseph Wathen, Jr., Pearlie Reed, Lloyd Wright, Carl Ruiz-Martin, Joe Leonard, United States Department of Justice, Eric Holder and Mike Spalding |
4:2010cv00074 |
May 24, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Owensboro Office |
Daviess |
Joseph H. McKinley |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (1) Defendants motion for substitution of the United States as a party 67 is GRANTED IN PART. The United States is substituted as a party for the negligent retention claim. (2) Defendants Motion to Dismiss 68 is GRA NTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The claims for fraud and malicious prosecution against Defendants Spalding and Wathen continue pending an evidentiary hearing to be held at a later date. (3) An evidentiary hearing will be held to determine whether Defendants Spalding and Wathen were working within the scope of their employment when they allegedly committed the state-law torts of fraud and malicious prosecution. The Court shall schedule the hearing following the telephonic conference on September 29, 2011. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 9/28/11. cc:counsel (JBM) |
Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 30 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 3/10/11. cc:counsel (JBM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.