Thomas v. Dana Corporation

Plaintiff: Jeffery Thomas
Defendant: Dana Corporation
Case Number: 4:2013cv00041
Filed: April 9, 2013
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Owensboro Office
County: Henderson
Referring Judge: H. Brent Brennenstuhl
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. McKinley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 1, 2014 31 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiffs Second and Third claim in the Amended Complaint are dismissed. All other claims remain. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 3/31/14. cc:counsel (JBM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Dana Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffery Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dana Corporation
Represented By: Shannon Antle Hamilton
Represented By: Karen M. Paulin(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Rebecca A. Weis(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?