Roach et al v. Hughes et al
| Cheryl Roach and Stephen Philip Roach, II |
| Laura Hughes, Warner Chilcott Sales (US) LLC, Warner Chilcott, PLC and Wheels LT |
| 4:2013cv00136 |
| December 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| Daviess |
| H. Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
164
Jury Instructions. (JBM)
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 8/3/2015: Plaintiffs Objections 78 to the Magistrate Judges Order entered 6/19/2015 75 are SUSTAINED. cc: counsel, HBB (JBM)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants Motion to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Laura Lampton 24 is DENIED; Defendants Motion to Limit the Scope of Dr. Randy Joe Coxs Opinion Testimony 25 is DENIED; Plaintiffs Motion to Limit the Scope of Dr. David Shrabergs Opinion Testimony 29 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Plaintiffs Motion to Limit the Scope of Dr. Kathleen Rodowiczs Opinion Testimony 45 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 6/29/2015. cc: Counsel(JBM)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 5/26/2015: Plaintiffs Objections DN 51 to the Magistrate Judges Order entered 3/6/2015 DN 40 are OVERRULED. cc:counsel (JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
