Hart v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Kentucky Western District Hart v. Commissioner of Social Security

Hart v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Aaron Joseph Hart
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	4:2014cv00009
Filed:	January 28, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office:	Owensboro Office
County:	Hopkins
Presiding Judge:	H. Brent Brennenstuhl
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 8, 2016	Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 3/7/2016: The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. This is a final and appealable Order and there is no just cause for delay. cc: counsel, Aaron Hart (pro se) (JBM)
July 3, 2014	Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 10 Motion to Remand; Signed by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 7/2/14: The Social Security Appeals Council shall remand the case to an Administrative Law Judge for a new hearing and issue a new decis ion, de novo. The Court also finds that this Court retains jurisdiction of the case and will not enter a final judgment until after post-remand proceedings are completed, the Commissioner has filed with the Court an answer and administrative record, and Plaintiff has had the opportunity to file his Fact and Law Summary if there is an unfavorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge. cc: Counsel, Aaron Joseph Hart (pro se) (DJT)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 8, 2016

Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 3/7/2016: The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. This is a final and appealable Order and there is no just cause for delay. cc: counsel, Aaron Hart (pro se) (JBM)

July 3, 2014

Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 10 Motion to Remand; Signed by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 7/2/14: The Social Security Appeals Council shall remand the case to an Administrative Law Judge for a new hearing and issue a new decis ion, de novo. The Court also finds that this Court retains jurisdiction of the case and will not enter a final judgment until after post-remand proceedings are completed, the Commissioner has filed with the Court an answer and administrative record, and Plaintiff has had the opportunity to file his Fact and Law Summary if there is an unfavorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge. cc: Counsel, Aaron Joseph Hart (pro se) (DJT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hart v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron Joseph Hart
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Regina S. Edwards
Represented By:	Brady Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?