Boultinghouse v. Herrington et al
| Christopher Boultinghouse |
| Ron Herrington, Colonel Gibson, Captain Floyd and Lt. Ryan |
| 4:2014cv00100 |
| September 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| Henderson |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr., holding that because Plaintiff has failed to comply with straightforward Orders of this Court (DNs 53 & 56) or taken any action in response to the Court's Orders, he has abandoned any interest in prosecuting this action. Therefore, the Court will dismiss the action by separate Order. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel of Record (RR)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 39 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendant Henderson County. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 7/18/2016. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff (pro se)(JBM)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr., granting 21 Defendant Ryan's Motion for a Protective Order to the extent that it will allow Defendant to produce his personnel file for an in camera review. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel (RR)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr., denying 18 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel of Record.(RR)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. Upon intital screening of the complaint, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's individual-capacity claims against Defendants Herrington, Gibson, and Floyd; his official-capacity claims against Herrington, Gibson, Floyd, and Ryan; his claims concerning alleged overcrowding, insufficient food, commissary and medical charges, grievance handling, and medical treatment; and injunctive-relief claims are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. & #167; 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages against Henderson County is DISMISSED pursuant to § 1915A(b)(2) for seeking relief from a def endant who is immune from such relief. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants Herrington, Gibson, and Floyd as parties to this action since no claims remain against them. The Court will enter a separate Scheduling Order governing the claims that have been permitted to proceed. cc:Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Henderson County Attorney (ERH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
