Preferred Care of Delaware, Inc. et al v. Blankenship
| Preferred Care of Delaware, Inc., Fordsville Health Facilities, L.P., Fordsville Health Facilities GP, LLC, Preferred Care Partners Management Group, LP, PCPMG, LLC and Kentucky Partners Management, LLC |
| Jeffery Blankenship |
| 4:2016cv00131 |
| October 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| Ohio |
| H. Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 12/12/2016 granting 2 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Enjoin Defendant; Blankenship is ENJOINED from proceeding against the plaintiffs in the Ohio Circuit Court actio n until the conclusion of the ordered arbitration. The parties are COMPELLED to arbitrate all claims which are the subject of Blankenship's claims in Ohio Circuit Court. Counsel shall promptly inform the Ohio Circuit Court of this Memorandu m Opinion and Order. This proceeding is STAYED until the conclusion of the ordered arbitration; The Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED. denying 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 9 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 9 Motion to Dismiss cc: Counsel(JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
