White v. Transportation Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: William Stefan White
Defendant: Transportation Services, Inc., Genaro Sanchez Ramirez and David M. Morales
Case Number: 4:2016cv00138
Filed: October 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Owensboro Office
County: Hopkins
Presiding Judge: H. Brent Brennenstuhl
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. McKinley
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 299 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 8/22/2018 denying 279 Motion to Exclude Defendants' Proposed Animations; denying 280 Motion to Strike Expert and to Exclude Testimony of Fred Turek; denying 281 Motion to Strike Expert and to Exclude Opinions, Photographs and Testimony of David Cades. cc: Counsel(JM)
August 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 298 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 8/8/18: Granting 266 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 267 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 268 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 278 Motion for Summary Judgment cc: Counsel(DJT)
March 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 250 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 3/29/2018 denying 209 Morale's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 210 Ramirez's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 211 TIS' Motion for Summary Judgment cc: Counsel(JM)
December 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 216 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 12/21/17: Defendant Morales' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DN 61 ) is DENIED; Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DN 100 ) is DENIED; Plaintiffs� 39; Motion to Supplement (DN 127 ) is DENIED; Defendant Morales' Motion to Strike (DN 128 ) is DENIED; Defendant Morales' Motion to Withdraw or Amend (DN 129 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiffs' Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted (DN 130 ) is GRANTED.cc:counsel (DJT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Transportation Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Stefan White
Represented By: William R. Garmer
Represented By: John E. Norman
Represented By: Jerome P. Prather
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Transportation Services, Inc.
Represented By: John M. Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Genaro Sanchez Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David M. Morales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?