ADA-ES, Inc. v. Big Rivers Electric Corporation
| ADA-ES, Inc. |
| Big Rivers Electric Corporation |
| 4:2018cv00016 |
| February 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| H. Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
215
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 11/23/20 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ADA's Daubert Motion to Exclude Lew Benson [DN 169 ] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED AS MOOT IN PART. ADA's Daubert Motion to Exclude Jack Hilbert [DN 167 ] is GRANTED. Big Rivers' Daubert Motion to Exclude Paul Ireland [DN 168 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. Big Rivers' Daubert Motion to Exclude Eric Klein [DN 162 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. cc: Counsel(DJT)
|
|
Filing
160
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 6/9/20 denying 118 Motion for Leave to Amend. cc: Counsel(DJT)
|
|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 5/6/2019 denying 82 Motion for Protective Order. However, ADA-ES is entitled to entry of a protective order providing for confidentiality of the information produced. The parties are directed to confer and tender a mutually acceptable protective order in this regard. cc: Counsel (JM)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 1/24/2019: The Plaintiff's Motion 59 for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED; Defendant's Cross-Motion 63 for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED; The Defendant's Rule 56(d) Motion 63 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motion 66 to Strike is DENIED. cc: Counsel(JM)
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 1/18/2019 granting 70 Motion for Leave to file Counterclaim. Pursuant to this order, the Clerk of the Court is directed to file the proposed counterclaim. cc: Counsel (JM)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER SUA SPONTE TRANSFERRING CASE. ORDERED: 1. This case is sua sponte TRANSFERRED to the Western District of Kentucky; 2. To the extent that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 27 argues that Plaintiff's Complaint 20 should be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2), it is DENIED as moot; and 3. To the extent that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 27 argues that Plaintiff's Complaint 20 should be dismissed for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), it is DENIED without prejudice, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/12/2018. (dhans, ) [Transferred from cod on 2/12/2018.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
