Scholl v. Lewis et al
Charles David Scholl |
Dr. Lester Lewis and APRN Lessye Crafton |
4:2018cv00131 |
August 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Owensboro Office |
Muhlenberg |
Joseph H McKinley |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 10/2/2018 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. LSCC to collect filing fee from inmate trust account. Clerk to open account for receipt of filing fee payment. cc: Plaintiff (Pro se), Finance, LSCC- Inmate Accounts (JM) |
Filing 6 Letter from Charles David Scholl. (A docket sheet in this action as well as civil action 4:18cv-99 has been sent to Plaintiff on this date.) (JM) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Charles David Scholl (DJT) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles David Scholl. (DJT) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Charles David Scholl (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lessye Crafton, Lester Lewis, filed by Charles David Scholl. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Exhibit) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.