Warren v. MAK Logistics Corp et al
Trevar D. Warren |
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Delbert D. Armstrong and MAK Logistics Corp |
4:2018cv00180 |
December 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
H Brent Brennenstuhl |
Joseph H McKinley |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Trevar D. Warren. (Scott, David) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER from proceedings held before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl; Scheduling Conference held on 1/24/2019: Defendant Amended Pleadings and Joinder of Parties due by 4/30/2019. Plaintiff Amended Pleadings and Joinder of Parties due by 4/30/2019. Daubert & Dispositive Motions due by 12/16/2019. Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 8/15/2019. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 7/1/2019. Fact Discovery due by 12/2/2019. Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosure due by 1/21/2019. Telephone Conference set for 12/9/2019 10:00 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. cc: Counsel (DJT) |
Filing 14 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Delbert D. Armstrong. (Davis, Michael) |
Filing 13 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MAK Logistics Corp. (Davis, Michael) |
Filing 12 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.. (Davis, Michael) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.. (Davis, Michael) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MAK Logistics Corp. (Davis, Michael) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas K. Haynes on behalf of Trevar D. Warren (Haynes, Nicholas) |
Filing 8 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Delbert D. Armstrong, Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., MAK Logistics Corp. (Davis, Michael) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 12/10/18: Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosure due by 12/31/2018. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/14/2019. Telephonic Rule 16 Conference set for 1/18/2019 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl.cc:counsel (DJT) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL LETTER sent to Ohio Circuit Court re #1 Notice of Removal. (DJT) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 12/3/18: This action is hereby REFERRED to the Honorable H. BRENT BRENNENSTUHL, United States Magistrate Judge, for determination of non-dispositive matters pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Said Magistrate is empowered to conduct any hearings necessary for their resolution. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel (DJT) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent FedEx Corporation for Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.. by Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.. (DJT) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MAK Logistics Corp. (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL [ANSWER FILED] by Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Delbert D. Armstrong, MAK Logistics Corp from Ohio Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-00379. Filing fee $ 400; receipt number 0644-2762303, filed by Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Delbert D. Armstrong, MAK Logistics Corp. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Record) (DJT) |
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Delbert D. Armstrong, Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., MAK Logistics Corp. (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.