Burke v. Allen et al
William D. Burke |
Sgt Hicks, Sgt Hempling, Sgt Allen and Sgt Isal |
4:2018cv00189 |
December 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Joseph H McKinley |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 2/15/2019: Within 30 days from the entry date of this Order, Plaintiff shall: Submit a certified copy of the jail trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint; and Complete and submit a summons form for each Defendant named in the complaint. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send four blank summons forms to Plaintiff for completion. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) w/ forms (JM) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint.Reason for Deficiency: Summons not Tendered nor Prison Trust Account Statement Filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 1/28/2019. (DJT) |
Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff William D. Burke (DJT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Allen, Hempling, Hicks, Isal, filed by William D. Burke. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.