Ruckert v. Bailey et al
Jacob Ruckert |
Ryan Clark and Ryan Bailey |
4:2019cv00175 |
December 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
H Brent Brennenstuhl |
Joseph H McKinley |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Letter from Jacob Ruckert. (DJT) |
Filing 5 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 12/13/19 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), however, Plaintif is required to pay the $350.00 statutory filing fee under an installment plan. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 604 (6th Cir. 1997) (When an inmate seeks pauper status, the only issue is whether the inmate pays the entire fee at the initiation of the proceeding or over a period of time under an installment plan.). cc: Plaintiff(pro se), Finance, HCJ (DJT) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jacob Ruckert. (DJT) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jacob Ruckert (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ryan Bailey, Ryan Clark, filed by Jacob Ruckert. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.