Cowen v. Akers
Eddie Cowen and Eddie Cowan |
Daniel Akers |
4:2019cv00192 |
December 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Joseph H McKinley |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 1/7/20; denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: Petitioner shall tender the $5.00 filing fee to the Clerk of Court within 30 days from the date of entry of this Order. Checks or money orders shall be made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and mailed to Office of the Clerk, United States District Court, Western District of Kentucky, 601 West Broadway, Ste. 106, Louisville, Kentucky 40202-2249. cc: Petitioner(pro se) (DJT) |
Filing 4 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eddie Cowen. (DJT) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Eddie Cowen (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (DJT) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eddie Cowen. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Petition Notice) (DJT) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/27/2019: #3 Exhibit 1 - Appeal from Hopkins Circuit Court, #4 Exhibit Opinion and Order, #5 Exhibit Brief for Appellant) (DJT). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.