Goodrich v. Madisonville Police Department et al
| Anthony D. Goodrich, II |
| Scott Gibson, James Chamberlin, Daniel Cavanaugh, Richard Cobb, Allen Stokes, Judge Brantley, Justin Crump, Madisonville Police Department, Hopkins County Jail and Clay Stroud |
| 4:2020cv00022 |
| February 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint.Reason for Deficiency: Summons not tendered with Complaint Filing. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 3/11/2020. (DJT) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Anthony D. Goodrich, II. (DJT) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anthony D. Goodrich, II (DJT) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brantley, Daniel Cavanaugh, James Chamberlin, Richard Cobb, Justin Crump, Scott Gibson, Hopkins County Jail, Madisonville Police Department, Allen Stokes, Clay Stroud, filed by Anthony D. Goodrich, II. (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
