Ivy v. Brady et al
| Marcus Ivy |
| Cookie Crews and Amy Brady |
| 4:2020cv00133 |
| August 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 8/27/20 denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel : This ruling does not prevent Plaintiff from requesting the appointment of counsel at a future point in this action should circumstances arise to warrant such a request. cc: Plaintiff(pro se) (DJT)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 8/27/20; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. cc: Plaintiff(pro se), Finance, HCDC (DJT)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Marcus Ivy (DJT) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marcus Ivy. (DJT) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Marcus Ivy (DJT) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amy Brady, Cookie Crews, filed by Marcus Ivy. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons 2) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
