Harrison v. Wellpath Corporation et al
James Harrison |
Jane Doe, Patrick A. Kessinger, Wellpath Corporation, Lessye Crafton, Patrick Barnett, Kentucky Department of Corrections, Randy White, Sgt Kennedy, Anna D'Amico, John Doe and Corrections Officer Kevin R. Mazza |
4:2020cv00153 |
September 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
H Brent Brennenstuhl |
Joseph H McKinley |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 PLAINTIFF'S ADDITIONAL OBJECTIONS to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by James Harrison. (DJT) |
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION INITIAL SCREENING PURSUANT TO PRISON LITIGATION REOFRM ACT re #1 Notice of Removal, , #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Lessye Crafton, Anna D'Amico, Wellpath Corporation. (Sharp, William) |
Filing 10 Response to Objections re #9 Objection,, Response to Motion, RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO REMOVAL filed by Lessye Crafton, Anna D'Amico, Wellpath Corporation. (Sharp, William) |
Filing 9 OBJECTIONS AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' PREVIOUS FILED MOTIONS re #5 MOTION INITIAL SCREENING PURSUANT TO PRISON LITIGATION REOFRM ACT re #1 Notice of Removal, , #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, ( Replies due by 10/8/2020.) filed by James Harrison. (DJT) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Joinder by Patrick Barnett, Kennedy, Kentucky Department of Corrections, Patrick A. Kessinger, Kevin R. Mazza, Randy White re #5 MOTION INITIAL SCREENING PURSUANT TO PRISON LITIGATION REOFRM ACT re #1 Notice of Removal, , #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, (Brown, Allison) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 9/14/20: Referral to USMJ is vacated this date. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel, Plaintiff(pro se) (DJT) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendants Lessye Crafton, Anna D'Amico, Wellpath Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sharp, William) |
Filing 5 MOTION INITIAL SCREENING PURSUANT TO PRISON LITIGATION REOFRM ACT re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendants Lessye Crafton, Anna D'Amico, Wellpath Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sharp, William) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL LETTER sent to Muhlenberg Circuit Court re #1 Notice of Removal. (DJT) |
Filing 3 TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 9/10/20: This action is hereby REFERRED to the Honorable H. BRENT BRENNENSTUHL, United States Magistrate Judge, for determination of non-dispositive matters pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Said Magistrate is empowered to conduct any hearings necessary for their resolution. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL [NO ANSWER FILED] by Anna D'Amico, Wellpath Corporation, Lessye Crafton from Muhlenberg Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-00224. Filing fee $ 400; receipt number 0644-3180629, filed by Anna D'Amico, Wellpath Corporation, Lessye Crafton. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit State Court Record) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.