Johnson v. Washington et al
Christopher Michael Johnson |
Roy Washington and Jason Woosley |
4:2020cv00180 |
October 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Joseph H McKinley |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Summons Issued as to Roy Washington. Summons Packet & Documents delivered to USM for service this date per ORDER entered. (DJT) |
Filing 14 SERVICE AND SCHEDULING ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 12/8/20. cc: Plaintiff(pro se Prisoner Handbook and Orders), Deft Washington, GCA (DJT) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 12/7/20: IT IS ORDERED that the official-capacity claims against Defendants Washington and Woosley and the individual-capacity claim against Defendant Woosley are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Woosley as a party to this action. The Court will enter a separate Order governing the claim which will proceed. cc: Plaintiff(pro se), Defts, GCA (DJT) |
Filing 12 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 12/3/20 ; granting #10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis cc: Plaintiff(pro se), Finance, GCDC (DJT) |
Filing 11 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Christopher Michael Johnson (JM) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christopher Michael Johnson (JM) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Roy Washington, Jason Woosley, filed by Christopher Michael Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (JM) |
Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable #5 sent to Christopher Michael Johnson (DJT) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 11/9/2020 ; denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: Plaintiff shall within 30 days of entry of this Order file a prisoner application to proceed without prepayment of fees along with a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing ofthe complaint. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a 1983 complaint form, two summons forms, and a prisoner application to proceed without prepayment of fees with the instant case number affixed to each. Plaintiff is WARNED that his failure to comply fully with this Order within the time allotted will result in DISMISSAL of the instant action. cc: Plaintiff(pro se) (DJT) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable #5 sent to Christopher Michael Johnson (DJT) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint.Reason for Deficiency: Summons not tendered. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 11/18/2020. (DJT) (Main Document 5 replaced on 10/20/2020) (DJT). |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Christopher Michael Johnson. (DJT) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christopher Michael Johnson (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Roy Washington, Jason Woosley, filed by Christopher Michael Johnson. (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.