Schriber v. Child Protective Services - Protection & Permanency of Kentucky et al
| Christa Schriber |
| Amy Mathis, Heather Cann, Tracy Sturgill and Child Protective Services - Protection & Permanency of Kentucky |
| 4:2021cv00018 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REQUEST for entry of default by the Clerk and MOTION for Default Judgment by Plaintiff Christa Schriber (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A and B, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D) (EAS) |
| Remark: ECF Notification Acct created for Plaintiff re: #12 and emailed (KJA) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Pro Se (Non Prisoner) Registration to Receive Documents Electronically by Christa Schriber (EAS) |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT re #5 Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Christa Schriber. (EAS) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to by Plaintiff Christa Schriber (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (EAS) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christa Schriber (EAS) |
Filing 8
ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 3/12/2021: IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new application on a Court-supplied form. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a Court-approved non-prisoner application form. Plaintiff warned failure to comply with this Order within 30 days will result in dismissal of this action. cc: Plaintiff, pro se(EAS)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 3/8/2021: Plaintiff has filed documents containing the names of individuals known to be minors. Clerk is directed to restrict access to these documents [5, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5] to court users and participants in the case. IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff shall file a motion to seal the documents or a motion seeking leave to file a redacted version of each document along with a copy of the redacted version within 30 days of entry of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff files a motion seeking leave to file a redacted version of each document, the motion will be granted and the Clerk will replace the documents with the redacted versions. cc: Plaintiff, pro se (EAS)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING NON-SCANNED EXHIBIT by Christa Schriber - Exhibit Attachment A to #5 MOTION EMERGENCY MOTION for return of child. (EAS) |
| Filing 5 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS/RESTORATION OF PROPERTY and EMERGENCY MOTION for return of child by Plaintiff Christa Schriber (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Affidavit of Facts, #3 Affidadvit of Truth, #4 Attachment B, #5 Proposed Order Writ, #6 Summons) (EAS) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to confirm arbitration award by Plaintiff Christa Schriber (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Affidavit of Facts, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B) (EAS) |
| Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley Jr. (MNM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Short Form) by Plaintiff Christa Schriber. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Heather Cann, Child Protective Services - Protection & Permanency of Kentucky, Amy Mathis, and Tracy Sturgill, filed by Christa Schriber. (Attachments: #1 Breach of Contract Claim, #2 Exhibits Part 1, #3 Exhibits Part 2, #4 Cover Sheet) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
