Hughes v. Faith et al
Plaintiff: Valdeze Merthone Hughes
Defendant: Katherine E. Faith and Department of Public Advocacy
Case Number: 4:2022cv00014
Filed: January 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Joseph H McKinley
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 3/14/2022 Dismissing Case for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This is a final Order. The Court certifies that an appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants (EAS)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 3/13/2022: The Court will enter a separate Order of dismissal consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff forms for filing an action under 28 USC 2241 and 2254 should he wish to file a habeas action.cc: Plaintiff, pro se w/ 2241 and 2254 forms; Defendants (EAS)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE Signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. (EBOC) on 2/1/2022 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. An initial partial filing fee of $1.01 will be assessed by this Order. The Daviess County Detention Center shall collect the initial partial filing fee of $1.01 and thereafter collect the $348.99 balance of the filing fee (*see Order for specific content). The Clerk is directed to open an account for the payment of the filing fee in this action. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Financial Section USDC WDKY; Daviess County Detention Center, Attn: Inmate Acct. No. 224883, 3337 Highway 144, Owensboro, KY 42303(EAS)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Valdeze Merthone Hughes. (DJT)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Valdeze Merthone Hughes (DJT)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Public Advocacy, Katherine E. Faith, filed by Valdeze Merthone Hughes. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (DJT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hughes v. Faith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Valdeze Merthone Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katherine E. Faith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Public Advocacy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?