Greathouse v. Maglinger et al
| Richard Lewis Greathouse, Jr. |
| Jailer Art Maglinger and DCDC |
| 4:2022cv00064 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Letter from Plaintiff Richard Lewis Greathouse, Jr.. (EAS)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of new information to support claim by Richard Lewis Greathouse, Jr. re #1 Complaint (EAS)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) Signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 6/6/2022 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. DCDC to collect filing fee from inmate account. Clerk to open account for receipt of filing fee payment. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), DCDC- inmate accounts, Finance(JM)
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Richard Lewis Greathouse, Jr.. (DJT)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Richard Lewis Greathouse, Jr. (DJT)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against DCDC, Art Maglinger, filed by Richard Lewis Greathouse, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (DJT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
