Dawson v. Meijer, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lisa D. Dawson
Defendant: Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Stores Limited Partnership
Case Number: 4:2022cv00086
Filed: July 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: H Brent Brennenstuhl
Referring Judge: Joseph H McKinley
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2022 Filing 11 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Meijer Stores Limited Partnership. (Gray, Lindsay)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. (EBOC) on 8/24/2022: IT IS ORDERED Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/29/2022. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 10/17/2022 at 1:30 PM CDT before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl.cc:counsel; CM-HBB (EAS)
August 17, 2022 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Meijer Stores Limited Partnership. (Gray, Lindsay)
August 17, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint by Meijer Stores Limited Partnership. (Gray, Lindsay)
August 17, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re #6 Amended Complaint (EAS)
August 16, 2022 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Meijer, Inc., filed by Lisa D. Dawson. (Holtrey, Travis)
August 3, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lisa D. Dawson. Meijer, Inc. served on 7/28/2022, answer due 8/18/2022. (Holtrey, Travis)
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 7/22/2022: This action is hereby REFERRED to the Honorable H. BRENT BRENNENSTUHL, United States Magistrate Judge, for determination of non-dispositive matters pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Said Magistrate is empowered to conduct any hearings necessary for their resolution. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: counsel (JM)
July 22, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Meijer, Inc.. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (JM)
July 22, 2022 Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (JM)
July 22, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Meijer, Inc. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AKYWDC-3621718; filed by Lisa D. Dawson. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (JM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dawson v. Meijer, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa D. Dawson
Represented By: Davin L. Shaw
Represented By: Travis L. Holtrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Meijer, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Meijer Stores Limited Partnership
Represented By: Christopher M. Piekarski
Represented By: Lindsay M. Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?