Randolph v. Hopkins Co. Jail et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth Andrew Randolph
Defendant: Hopkins Co. Jail and Jailer Mike Lewis
Case Number: 4:2022cv00120
Filed: August 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Joseph H McKinley
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. (EBOC) on 9/19/2022 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. IT IS ORDERED the Hopkins County Jail shall collect from Plaintiffs prison trust account an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $0.42 when such funds are available and shall forward the amount to the Clerk of the Court and thereafter collect the $349.58 balance (*see Order for specific content). The Clerk of Court is directed to open an account for the payment of the filing fee in this action. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Financial Section USDC KYWD; Hopkins County Jail, Attn: Inmate Accounts, P.O. Box 1030, Madisonville, KY 42431(EAS)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Response to #4 Notice of Deficiency, Summons Tendered filed by Kenneth Andrew Randolph. (DJT)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of filing (page 3) by Kenneth Andrew Randolph re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (EAS)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint.Reason for Deficiency: No Summons Tendered and No Prisoner Trust Account Statement Filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 9/28/2022. (DJT)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Page 3 missing) by Plaintiff Kenneth Andrew Randolph (DJT) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/6/2022: #1 Page 3 of motion) (EAS).
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Page 4 Filed, no summons filed) against Hopkins Co. Jail, Mike Lewis, filed by Kenneth Andrew Randolph. (DJT) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/12/2022: #1 Summons) (DJT).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Randolph v. Hopkins Co. Jail et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Andrew Randolph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hopkins Co. Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jailer Mike Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?