Sobin v. Lanham et al
| Gregory D. Sobin |
| Lt. Lanham and Sgt Deno |
| 4:2023cv00092 |
| August 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Change of Address by Gregory D. Sobin and REQUEST for docket sheet (address listed on this pleading is what we have on file). (EAS) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Address by Gregory D. Sobin and REQUEST for receipt (EAS) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregory D. Sobin. Deno served on 10/4/2023, answer due 10/25/2023. (EAS) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregory D. Sobin. Lanham served on 10/4/2023, answer due 10/25/2023. (EAS) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Deno, Lanham. (Hunter, Davis) |
| Filing fee: $ 333.88 receipt number 300004974 re #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, (KF) |
| Filing fee: $ 16.12 receipt number 300004989 re #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, (KF) |
| Filing 11 Letter from Plaintiff Gregory D. Sobin. (EAS) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST for Production of Documents to Non-party by Gregory D. Sobin. (EAS) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for assistance with recruiting counsel by Plaintiff Gregory D. Sobin (EAS) |
| Filing 8 Letter from Plaintiff Gregory D. Sobin. (EAS) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Deno, Lanham. Summons packets being e-mailed to US Marshal Service as instructed. (Attachments: #1 USM 285s) (EAS) |
Filing 6
INITIAL REVIEW AND SERVICE AND SCHEDULING ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 8/21/2023: IT IS ORDERED that the official-capacity claims against Defendants are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall issue summonses, and the US Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint #1 , summonses, and this Order on Defendants Lanham and Deno in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A copy of the complaint and this Order shall also be mailed to the Henderson County Attorney. Pre-trial Discovery due by 12/18/2023. Plaintiff's Pre-trial Memorandum due by 1/17/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 2/16/2024. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a copy of the Pro Se Prisoner Handbook. cc: Plaintiff, pro se, w/ PSPH; Defendants Lanham and Deno, as directed above; Henderson County Attorney, as directed above (EAS)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE Signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. (EBOC) on 8/18/2023 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of this Court is directed to open an account for the payment of the filing fee in this action. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Finance USDC WDKY; Henderson Co Dtn Ctr, Attn: Inmate Accts No. 136745, POB 979, Henderson, KY 42419(EAS)
|
| Schedules Initial Review due by 12/18/2023. (EAS) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gregory D. Sobin. (DJT) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Gregory D. Sobin (DJT) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Deno, Lanham, filed by Gregory D. Sobin. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
