Osborne et al v. Harmon et al
| Mark J. Osborne and Class Members |
| Jailer Stephan Harmon, Melissa Wathen, Bruce Todd, Deputy Whitaker, Officer Knight, John & Jane Doe, Officer Brickner and ViaPath and Affiliates |
| 4:2023cv00116 |
| October 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Discovery by Plaintiff Mark J. Osborne (EAS) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Mark J. Osborne (EAS) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus to Preserve and Retain Records by Plaintiff Mark J. Osborne (EAS) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mark J. Osborne. (EAS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mark J. Osborne (EAS) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. (EAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John & Jane Doe, Stephan Harmon, Knight, Bruce Todd, Melissa Wathen, Whitaker, filed by Class Members, Mark J. Osborne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Cover Letter) (EAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
