Gunkel v. Huuuge, Inc. et al
| Clay Manning Gunkel |
| Huuuge, Inc. and Huuuge Global, Ltd. |
| 4:2024cv00092 |
| August 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Charles R Simpson |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Diversity Case Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(2)) by Clay Manning Gunkel. (Rhoads, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency Christopher L. Rhoads re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Missing Rule 7.1(a)(2) Disclosure Statement. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 8/30/2024. (DeW) |
| Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to Huuuge Global, Ltd., Huuuge, Inc.. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summonses. **Attested Complaint emailed to Attorney for Plaintiff.** (DeW) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (DeW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT STATEWIDE RELIEF SOUGHT filed by Clay Manning Gunkel against Huuuge, Inc., Huuuge Global, Ltd. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AKYWDC-4092479.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - NBC News Article, #2 Exhibit 2 - PlayUSA Article, #3 Summons TENDERED Huuuge, Inc., #4 Summons TENDERED Huuge Global, Ltd., #5 Cover Sheet) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
