MCI Communications Services, Inc v. BRV Equipment, Inc
Plaintiff: MCI Communications Services, Inc
Defendant: BRV Equipment, Inc
Case Number: 5:2008cv00033
Filed: March 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Personal Property: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 2/9/09; re 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by BRV Equipment, Inc ; an appropriate order shall issuecc:counsel (KJS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCI Communications Services, Inc v. BRV Equipment, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MCI Communications Services, Inc
Represented By: James A. Sigler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRV Equipment, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?