Baze v. Huddleston et al
Ralph Baze |
Hobert Huddleston, Tom Simpson, LaDonna Thompson and Duke Pettit |
5:2010cv00086 |
April 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Paducah Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Thomas B. Russell |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/10/2012; re 69 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Hobert Huddleston ; an appropriate order shall issuecc:counsel (KJA) |
Filing 67 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 1/17/2012. cc:counsel (KJA) |
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 29 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 32 Motion for final adjudication; granting 33 Motion for Extension of Time to File; denying 37 Motion for law library to make copies of documents ; denying 44 Motion to hold proceeding in abeyance. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 5/13/2011. cc:counsel (KJA) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 15 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 16 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 17 Motion Requesting the Clerk to Provide Copies of the Record. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 2/11/2011. cc:counsel (KJA) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 10/5/2010: an appropriate order shall entercc:counsel (KJA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.