Perry v. City of Oak Grove, Kentucky
Plaintiff: Milton D. Perry
Defendant: City of Oak Grove, Kentucky
Case Number: 5:2011cv00134
Filed: August 5, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Paducah Office
County: Christian
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 4 Motion to Dismiss Telephone Conference set for 2/10/2012 at 9:30 AM before Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 11/14/2011. cc:counsel (KJA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perry v. City of Oak Grove, Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Milton D. Perry
Represented By: Todd C. Barsumian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Oak Grove, Kentucky
Represented By: Charles David Cole
Represented By: Derrick T. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?