Taylor v. Adams et al
Plaintiff: Mark A. Taylor
Defendant: Bill Adams, McCracken County Jail and McCracken County, Kentucky
Case Number: 5:2011cv00164
Filed: September 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Paducah Office
County: McCracken
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 87 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 8/12/2013; re 79 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Bill Adams, McCracken County, Kentucky, 84 MOTION waiving immunity filed by Mark A. Taylor; an appropriate order shall issue cc:counsel (KJA)
November 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 77 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 74 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 11/6/2012. cc:counsel (KJA)
October 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 69 Motion for Relief from Magistrate's Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 10/30/2012. cc:counsel (KJA)
July 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 43 Motion to assert claim for monetary damages ; granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion for Declaratory Judgment; Clerk of Court shall issue summons and USM shall serve a copy of the suppl cmp and summons on dft Bill Adams; see order for specifics. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/25/2012. cc:counsel (KJA)
July 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 54 Motion to Compel( Discovery due by 9/30/2012., Dispositive Motions due by 11/29/2012., Pre-trial Memorandum due by 10/30/2012.); granting 54 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; granting 55 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 7/5/2012. cc:counsel (KJA) Modified on 7/5/2012 to edit document type (KJA).
December 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 5 Motion for preliminary injunction ; granting 12 Motion for injunctive relief claim against McCracken County ; denying 13 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 12/21/2011. cc:counsel (KJA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Adams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McCracken County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McCracken County, Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark A. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?