Roach v. Hiland et al
Plaintiff: Antoine Roach
Defendant: Steve Hiland and Chanin Hiland
Case Number: 5:2012cv00169
Filed: November 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Paducah Office
County: Lyon
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 67 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Greg N. Stivers; Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with LR 5.2(d) and has failed to comply with the Revised Scheduling Order, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has abandoned any interest in prosecuting this action. The Court will dismiss the action by separate Order.cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel of record (ERH)
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 38 Motion for Summary Judgment; ; denying 39 Motion to Strike ; granting 50 Motion for New Deadline; Dispositive Motions due by 10/31/2014.. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 9/23/2014. cc: Counsel(KJA)
August 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 40 Motion to Compel. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel of record (ERH)
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff's motion to compel (DN 32 ) within 21 days. IT IS ORDERED that the motion for medical treatment (DN 33 ) is DENIED. cc:Plaintiff, pro se; counsel of record (ERH)
November 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell; The Court construes DN 20 as motion for status and GRANTS motion. All pretrial deadlines have expired. If any party wishes to file a dispositive motion, he or she must do so within 30 days. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a docket sheet, copy of the Scheduling Order, and motion form. cc:Plaintiff, pro se; counsel (ERH)
July 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 16 Motion for name change; denying 18 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/6/2013. cc:counsel (KJA)
April 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 4/10/2013; see order for specifiscc:counsel (KJA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roach v. Hiland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antoine Roach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Hiland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chanin Hiland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?