Aprile Horse Transportation, Inc et al v. Prestige Delivery Systems, Inc. et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 2, 2015
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion to Compel; Signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 7/2/15: The Court finds that Prestiges responses to requests 33 and 43b do not comply with Rule 36 and orders that these responses are deemed admitted. The Court finds requests 4, 5, and 8 exceed the scope of allowable Rule 36 requests and sustains Prestige's objections to requests 4, 5, and 8. The Court finds that Prestige's response to request 17 complies with Rule 36 and Prestige need not amend its response. The Court find that Prestige's responses to requests 2, 3, 6, 7, 913, 16, 1820, 2528, 30, 34, 36, 43a, and 54 do not comply with Rule 36 and orders Prestige to serve amended responses to these request s consistent with this opinion. The Court overrules all of Prestige's objections other than the scope objections sustained for requests 4, 5, and 8. Prestige will serve amended responses required by this order within 30 days of this order. cc: Counsel(DJT)
|September 16, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting 20 Motion to Set Aside 14 Order on Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 9/16/2013. cc:counsel (KJA)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?